 |
Eric Sams
Selected
letters
to Maurice Brown
|
 |
9.
22nd
July 1970
My
dear Maurice,
nice, as ever, to hear from you; and good to know that you are
now fully restored (dear me; that sounds like what happens to Ancient
Monuments! not at all the sense I had intended).
And yes, thank you, my wife has for a time at least shaken free
of hospital visits and the like - indeed, shaken free of gravity
itself, or so it seemed when I watched her progress airborne towards
the North Pole, with the help, I should explain, of a jet aeroplane;
- though it had seemed, such was her excitement, that that
adventitious aid would be largely unnecessary - to visit her sister
in Canada. So now I'm on holiday for some weeks, and hope to catch up
with a number of commitments. It's rather disturbing that I seem to
be a great deal more pressed for time at home than in the office; at
this rate, I shall be at my most active in retirement, like a mouse
in a revolving cage.
Elgar - much obliged for your kind comments. I might try to
include those pieces in a book on Schumann, on the rather specious
ground that they have some general relevance. "Lawks" would have been
a distinct possibility (alternatives as in a News of the World type
crossword) except that the vocable AR was a datum. And "larks" had
the imprimatur of Michael Kennedy, who said that it was exactly
the way he would expect Elgar to have begun a carefree note to "one
of his girl-friends" (Kennedy's phrase, not mine!). I was sad,
incidentally, to see that Elgar's daughter died the other day; I can
only hope it wasn't anything to do with the July article! But she had
written to me quite kindly and helpfully earlier, with some
interesting data abut her father's interest in cipher, and how
solving them always seemed in the household a greater triumph than
the completion of one of his vast score. What a strange mind it must
have been: in its wav, how like Coleridge’s. There’s an affinity with
both in Schumann, too. I’m out in mind of associative processes in
art by a current re-reading of The Road to Xanadu, a work for
which I'm sure you share my admiration. I read it, (or you for
example) whenever I feel the need for humility, which is reasonably
often. The rather unhumble reason in the same, I think, in each
instance, namely that someone who so indisputably knows more than I
do about things about which I reckon to know quite a lot must
obviously have a prodigious, indeed superhuman, grasp of the subject!
Another oven more chastening reason is the reflection that (still on
the Coleridgean tack) he knoweth much who loveth much; so I am also
by the same token shown to have been deficient in charity.
"Oh well, nobody's perfect" as Joe. E. Brown observed in the
pay–off line of "Some Like It Hot" (did you se that film?). Not even
Deutsch (or perhaps least of all Deutsch) he might have added; I'm
suddenly reminded of the proximate cause of this letter. I heard from
Hermann Baron recently of a pirated edition of Deutsch now being
brought out by Kalmus in the States. There’s also bee talk for some
time of a new edition from (?) Bärenreiter.
Now, I bet that neither of these has been properly revised. So would
it not be a nice notion to interest a publisher here in bringing out
a properly–accredited version of the Thematic Catalogue,
incorporating all necessary corrections and additions (including the
very interesting inferences which can be drawn from Christa Landon's
discoveries – isn't it about time they were reported in the MT or
somewhere, by the way? I haven't seen any reference in print yet). I
should have thought that the potential sales nowadays would justify
such a venture commercially; further, the information would come in
very a propos for a new Grove; and finally all that work of ours
(quite a lot that I know of, plus, I'm sure, a lot that I don't)
would all be duly recorded in one appropriate volume – and one
moreover which because of its specialist nature shouldn't really
affect the sales or saleability of your present and future
publications from other sources. I’m eagerly looking forward to the
Symphonies.
Yours ever

|