CENTRO STUDI ERIC SAMS

per la ricerca sul Lied tedesco

 

Direttore Erik Battaglia

 

 

Sams/Shakespeare

archive

Home > on Cryptography > Elgar and cryptology

 

 

home

  

 

Centro Studi

  Eric Sams: Essays on Music
  Eric Sams: Music Reviews
 

Eric Sams: Works on Shakespeare

 

Eric Sams: on Cryptography, Letters             

  A Portrait by Andrew Lamb
  Interview by John C. Tibbetts
  Lieder Sound Archive
  Scuola Superiore "Hugo Wolf"
  Edizioni Analogon
  Contatti

 

Search the web-site


 

 

 

ERIC SAMS: LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

 

 

Elgar and cryptology

 

© The Musical Times, May 1984, p. 251 © the estate of eric sams

 

How sad that Brian Trowell should spoil his otherwise admirable article (March MT, p. 139) with all those confusions about cryptology. As to whether Elgar's solution to the Schooling challenge cipher was really 'a feat of considerable intellectual power' much depends on one's starting-point; but I bet some MT readers could do just as well in half an hour, even without previous experience. There is however little chance now that anyone will 'break his head over it', because the article itself has (in­advertently?) disclosed the answer. Next, Elgar's so-called 'notes on the Dorabella cipher' are no such thing; they are other possible applications of that cipher's symbols, a very different matter. Then it is naive to suppose that the Dorabella cipher properly so called, i.e. the note to Miss Penny dated 14 July 1897, relies on so sim­plistic a notion as varied vowel-frequency; that would hardly have baffled any com­petent analyst far five minutes, let alone 70 years. Of course Elgar the practised crvptologist and arch-mystifier would have dug much deeper defence. My suggestions included phonetic spelling because Elgar was notoriously obsessed with phonetic spelling; that idea still seems rather reasonable to me. The fact that he used no such phonetic devices when explaining some other cipher to a child 50 years later is obviously quite irrelevant The most un­fortunate misconception of all is that the Dorabella cipher should now be approach­ed via some entirely different and uncon­nected alphabet. Interested readers are warned to work solely from the symbols themselves, as published in Mrs Powell's 1937 book Edward Elgar or the February 1970 MT; the proposed Trowell translit­eration is not only silly in itself but misleadingly inaccurate. Looking again at those original symbols, incidentally, I can now envisage more clearly the actual cipher-tableau from which Elgar was working in 1897. I aim to submit a further article on that topic later this year.